The original JPEG was 7,33 Mo and the photo was thus taken indoorsĪt the Paris Motorshow. Package with the intention of printing the images. JPEGs and then set about reducing the noise content with the above I know that once you muck around with an image, you're going to Another option, if you work in Photoshop or similar progream is to do the noise reduction to taste in noiseware, right click and copy the image and then paste it into a new layer in photoshop. If you set it at 100% for me the resulting file is pretty darn close to what I put into it. Have you adjusted the jpeg settings yet? Under view, then options (at least on the freeware version) is a slider for setting jpeg quality. However, has anyone actually printed images which have been passed through 'Noiseware Professional'? What do you think? On screen (for the internet) I can say that the image look superb but I doubt it will pass the printing test.īefore anyone suggests that I reduce the overall settings, I've already done that but whatever I do, the image refuses to pass the 2,00 Mo level. Once passed though the programme and the image saved, I ended up by loosing 5,30 Mo of weight, a 1,73 Mo JPEG was the result. Settings Weaker Noise (Auto Setting in programme) The setting on Noiseware Professional were thus Naturally, there's a certain amount of noise in each image. The ISO on the camera was 400 and a fill flash was used. Daylight lighting conditions (2kw HMI's hanging from the lighting trusses). The original JPEG was 7,33 Mo and the photo was thus taken indoors at the Paris Motorshow. I coverted my RAWs into JPEGs and then set about reducing the noise content with the above package with the intention of printing the images. I know that once you muck around with an image, you're going to reduce it overall weight (in Mo or Ko).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |